INSIGHT INTO FOUR MAJOR LEADERSHIP CONTINGENCY THEORIES: CONSIDERING THE MODELS FOR INDONESIAN ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT

Sabilil Muttaqin; Mu’arif SAM; Mustolihudin Mustolihudin; Abusiri Abusiri

doi:10.47466/hikmah.v18i2.209

INSIGHT INTO FOUR MAJOR LEADERSHIP CONTINGENCY THEORIES: CONSIDERING THE MODELS FOR INDONESIAN ISLAMIC EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT

Sabilil Muttaqin, Mu’arif SAM, Mustolihudin Mustolihudin, Abusiri Abusiri

Abstract

Abstract

This study sought to investigate different features of contingency leadership theories to find a suitable model that can adapt to the changing context. This research is a qualitative study employing qualitative meta-analysis to achieve the aim of the study, which is discovering a suitable leadership model for volatile environment as well as situating the model into Indonesian Islamic educational context. Data were gathered from journal articles and books. The result shows that among the contingency leadership theory in the literature, the leadership model proposed by Vroom-Yetton-Jago can be considered more applicable to Indonesian Islamic educational context. However, some adjustment toward the model is needed, such as considering the concept of leadership substitute or leadership neutralizer introduced by Steven Kerr and John Jermier.

Abstrak

Penelitian ini berusaha untuk menelaah fitur-fitur dari empat teori kepemimpinan kontingensi untuk menemukan gaya kepemimpinan yang cocok digunakan pada konteks organisasi yang berubah-ubah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan teknik kualitatif meta-analisis untuk mencapai tujuan penelitian, yaitu menemukan model kepemimpinan yang cocok untuk lingkungan organisasi yang berubah-ubah serta mengkontekstualisasikan model tersebut pada konteks pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berasal dari berbagai literatur seperti artikel jurnal dan buku. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa di antara empat teori kepemimpinan kontingensi yang dianalisa, model kepemimpinan yang dikemukakan oleh Vroom-Yetton-Jago dapat dianggap lebih aplikatif dalam konteks pendidikan Islam di Indonesia. Namun, diperlukan beberapa penyesuaian terhadap model tersebut, seperti mempertimbangkan konsep leadership substitute (pengganti kepemimpinan) atau leadership neutralizer (penetral kepemimpinan) yang diperkenalkan oleh Steven Kerr dan John Jermier.

Keywords

leadership; contingency leadership theory; Indonesian Islamic educational context; kepemimpinan; teori kepemimpinan kontingensi; konteks pendidikan Islam di Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agazu, B.G., Z.A. Birbirsa, and S.Z. Werke, Leadership Models and Change Management: A Systematic Review. 2022.

Baden-Fuller, C. and D.J. Teece, Market sensing, dynamic capability, and competitive dynamics. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020.

Bansal, A. and D.R. King, Communicating change following an acquisition. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2022. 33(9).

Bartol, K.M., et al., Management Foundations. 2007: McGraw-Hill Australia.

Betrand, C.U., U.C.A. Moris, and O.G. Oluebube, Web Based Discussion Forum for Tertiary Institutions. American Journal of Networks and Communications, 2022. 11(1).

Campling, J., et al., Management: 2nd Asia-Pacific ed. 2006: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Creswell, J.W., Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. ed. 2014, Thousand Oaks: Thousand Oaks : SAGE.

Csiernik, R., D. Hannah, and J. Pender, Change, evolution and adaptation of an university EAP: Process and outcome at the University of Saskatchewan, in Employee Assistance Programs in Higher Education. 2022, Routledge.

Daft, R.L., Organization theory and design. 10th ed. 2010, Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning. xx.

Dominici, P., The weak link of democracy and the challenges of educating toward global citizenship. Prospects, 2022.

Dubrin, A.J., C. Dalglish, and P. Miller, Leadership, 2nd Asia-Pacific ed. 2006: John Wiley & Sons Australia.

Fiedler, F.E., A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. Mcgraw-Hill Series in Management. 1967.

Foss, N.J., J. Schmidt, and D.J. Teece, Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability. Long Range Planning, 2022.

Fulop, L., Management: A critical text. 1999: Macmillan International Higher Education.

Gentsoudi, V., Leadership theories review. Предприемачество, 2022. 10(1).

Gurr, D., L. Drysdale, and H. Goode, An open systems model of successful school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 2022.

Muttaqin, S., Implementing Dynamic Capability Framework on Indonesian Schools. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 2021. 6(1):

Muttaqin, S. Compatible Organization Designs in a Volatile Organizational Context. in Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies in conjunction with the 1st International Conference on Education, Science, Technology, Indonesian and Islamic Studies, ICIIS and ICESTIIS 2021, 20-21 October 2021, Jambi, Indonesia. 2022.

Nolsoe, N. and M. Strenger, Dynamic Capabilities- Do They Lead to Innovation Performance and Profitability? The IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 2013. X(4).

Pathak, B., M. Ashok, and Y. Leng Tan, Value co-creation in the B2B context: a conceptual framework and its implications. The Service Industries Journal, 2022. 42(3-4).

Paul, J. and M. Barari, Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? Psychology & Marketing, 2022.

Robb, A., et al., Enhancing organisational innovation capability–A practice-oriented insight for pharmaceutical companies. Technovation, 2022.

Sari, D.Y., The Study of Learning Organization Models: A Literature Review. Journal Research of Social, Science, Economics, and Management, 2022. 2(02).

Samson, D., T. Donnet, and R.L. Daft, Management. 2020: Cengage AU.

Shenkar, O. and S. Ellis, The Rise and Fall of Structural Contingency Theory: A Theory’s ‘autopsy’. Journal of Management Studies, 2022. 59(3).

Tsoukas, H. and R. Chia, On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 2002. 13(5).

Sakiru, O.K., K.S. Cheah, and K. Nwajiaku, Impact of Principal Leadership Styles on the Effectiveness of Schools: A Revisiting Review of the Literature (2018-2022). Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 2022. 34(4).

Volk, S., D.A. Waldman, and C.M. Barnes, A circadian theory of paradoxical leadership. Academy of Management Review, 2022(ja).

Vroom, V.H. and A.G. Jago, On the validity of the Vroom-Yetton model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1978. 63(2).

Vroom, V.H. and A.G. Jago, The role of the situation in leadership. American psychologist, 2007. 62(1).

Waldersee, R., A. Griffiths, and J. Lai, Predicting Organizational Change Success: Matching Organization Type, Change Type and Capabilities. The Journal of Applied Management and Enterpreneurship, 2003. 8(1).

Yukl, G.A., Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). 2009, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.

Zundel, M., Walking to learn: Rethinking reflection for management learning. Management Learning, 2012. 44(2)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47466/hikmah.v18i2.209

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ALHIKMAH Islamic Studies Institute (STAI ALHIKMAH) Jakarta Jl. Jeruk Purut No. 10 Cilandak Timur Pasar Minggu Jakarta Selatan 12650 Telp/Fax. (021) 7890521 E-mail: staialhikmahjakarta10@gmail.com/jurnal_hikmah@yahoo.com