Email this article FATWA DYNAMICS AND DOCTRINAL CONTROVERSIES: THE AHMADIYYA CASE IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC DISCOURSE
Abstract
Abstract
This article examines the fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding the Ahmadiyah movement in Indonesia. The research is motivated by the issuance of two MUI fatwas, in 1980 and 2005, stating that Ahmadiyah is heretical and outside Islam. The 1980 fatwa specifically issued a fatwa related to Qadiyani, while the 2005 fatwa covered both Qadiyani and Lahore. MUI fatwas are based on Quranic verses, hadith, and decisions of international Islamic bodies. The emergence of these two MUI fatwas illustrates the rejection and intense monitoring of the Ahmadiyah religious movement in Indonesia. Therefore, this study concludes that the factors of the emergence of two fatwas on Ahmadiyah are based on the influence of Rabithah through the Indonesian Da'wah Islamiyah Council (DDII), the recommendation of the Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs in 1979 to supervise Ahmadiyah and other deviant religious sects, the government's indecisiveness in dealing with the Qadiyani Ahmadiyah heresy, the emergence of unrest in the community, and the doctrine of Ahmadiyah Lahore which is in fact similar to Qadiyani. This research uses a qualitative approach and descriptive analysis method that relies on literature review.
Abstrak
Artikel ini mengkaji fatwa-fatwa yang dikeluarkan oleh Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) mengenai gerakan Ahmadiyah di Indonesia. Adanya penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penetapan dua fatwa MUI , pada tahun 1980 dan 2005, yang menyatakan bahwa Ahmadiyah adalah sesat dan berada di luar Islam. Fatwa tahun 1980 secara khusus mengeluarkan fatwa terkait Qadiyani, sementara fatwa tahun 2005 mencakup paham Qadiyani dan Lahore. Fatwa-fatwa MUI didasarkan pada ayat-ayat Al-Quran, hadis, dan keputusan-keputusan dari badan-badan Islam internasional. Kemunculan dua fatwa MUI ini menggambarkan penolakan dan pengawasan yang cukup intens akan gerakan keagamaan Ahmadiyah di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa faktor kemunculan dua fatwa tentang Ahmadiyah didasarkan pada pengaruh Rabithah melalui Dewan Dakwah Islamiyah Indonesia (DDII), adanya rekomendasi dari Kementerian Agama RI pada tahun 1979 untuk mengawasi aliran Ahmadiyah dan aliran keagamaan yang menyimpang lainnya, ketidaktegasan pemerintah dalam menghadapi aliran sesat Ahmadiyah Qadiyani, munculnya keresahan di masyarakat, dan doktrin Ahmadiyah Lahore yang nyatanya serupa dengan Qadiyani. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan metode analisis deskriptif yang bertumpu pada kajian pustaka.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Assyaukanie, Luthfi. “Fatwa and Violence in Indonesia.” Journal of Religion, 2009.
Atqa, Mohamad. “RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION IN INDONESIA” 1 (2010).
Avonius, Leena. “The Ahmadiyya & Freedom of Religion in Indonesia.” Isim Review 22, no. 1 (2008). https://hdl.handle.net/1887/17263.
Basyuni, Maftuh. “Sebelum Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Wafat, Tidak Ada Persoalan.” Tempo, February 26, 2006.
Budiwanti, Erni. “Pluralism Collapses: A Study of the Jama’Ah Ahmadiyah Indonesia and Its Persecution.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1645144.
Buehler, Michael. “Do Discriminatory Laws Have Societal Origins? The Diffusion of Anti-Ahmadiyah Regulations in Indonesia.” Politics and Religion 16, no. 3 (September 2023): 468–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048323000081.
Colbran, Nicola. “Realities and Challenges in Realising Freedom of Religion or Belief in Indonesia.” The International Journal of Human Rights 14, no. 5 (September 2010): 678–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642980903155166.
Crouch, Melissa. “Indonesia, Militant Islam and Ahmadiyah: Origins and Implications.” Islam, Syari’ah and Governance Background Paper Series, 2009.
Djazimah, Nurul, Arni Arni, and Maimanah Maimah. “Fenomena Aliran Keagamaan di Banjarmasin (Studi Kasus Ahmadiyah).” TASHWIR 1, no. 1 (September 18, 2014). https://doi.org/10.18592/jt.v1i1.113.
Fanani, Ahmad Fuad. “Shari’ah Bylaws in Indonesia and Their Implications for Religious Minorities.” JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM 05, no. 01 (2011).
“Fatwa MUI Nomor 11/MUNAS VII/MUI/15/2005 Tentang Ahmadiyah,” n.d.
Hanafi, Muchlis M. Menggugat Ahmadiyah; Mengungkap Ayat-Ayat Kontroversial Dalam Tafsir Ahmadiyah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, n.d.
Irawan, Andi Muhammad, Iskandar Abdul Samad, Sahril Nur, Iskandar Iskandar, Afifuddin Afifuddin, and Andi Syurganda. “Arguing against Political and Religious Discriminations: Critical Discourse Analysis of Indonesian Ahmadiyya.” Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 19, no. 1 (September 27, 2022): 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/mwjhr-2021-0024.
Maulana, Muhammad Hafiz Sher. True Fact about the Ahmadiyya Movement. Ahmadiyya Anjuman Ishaat Islam, n.d.
Mun’im, Zainul. “Argumen Fatwa MUI Tentang Kelompok Dan Paham Menyimpang 1994-2011; Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Disertasi, Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2016.
Osman, Mohamed Nawab Bin Mohamed. “Ahmadiyahs in Indonesia: Between Sensitivity and Diversity.” RSIS Commentaries, no. 061 (2008). https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82547.
Regus, Max. “The Victimization of the Ahmadiyya Minority Group in Indonesia: Explaining the Justifications and Involved Actors.” Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama Dan Lintas Budaya 4, no. 4 (December 31, 2020): 227–38. https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v4i4.10256.
Rofiqoh, Lilik. “The Fatwas of Majelis Ulama Indonesia on the Ahmadiyah Doctrines.” Asia Pasific Journal on Religion and Society 5, no. 1 (2021).
Rofiqoh, Lilik. “THE MUI’S VIEW ON AHMADIYAH AND THE DISPUTE SURROUNDING IT.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 2, no. 1 (June 1, 2010). https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v2i1.53.
Ropi, Ismatu. “Islamism, Government Regulation, and the Ahmadiyah Controversies in Indonesia.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 48, no. 2 (December 18, 2010): 281–320. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2010.482.281-320.
Saeed, Sadia. “Pakistani Nationalism and the State Marginalisation of the Ahmadiyya Community in Pakistan.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 7, no. 3 (December 2007): 132–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2007.tb00166.x.
Saifuddin. “Legal Opinion (Fatwa) of MUI (Council of Indonesian Ulama’) on Ahmadiyah.” Az-Zarqa’ 4, no. 2 (2012).
Sajari, Dimyati. “FATWA MUI TENTANG ALIRAN SESAT DI INDONESIA (1976-2010).” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 39, no. 1 (June 9, 2015). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v39i1.38.
Simandjuntak, Deasy. “Disciplining the Accepted and Amputating the Deviants: Religious Nationalism and Segregated Citizenship in Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 8, no. 1 (February 2021): 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.49.
Tim Peneliti. Himpunan Putusan Majelis Tarjih. III., n.d.
Tobibatussaadah. “Fatwa-fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia 2005; Otoritas Keagamaan Versus Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam Pasca Orde Baru.” Disertation, Sekolah Pascasarjana UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2009.
Wibowo, Ari. “Studi Kritis terhadap Fatwa Mejelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2005 tentang Aliran Ahmadiyah dan Kebijakan Negara dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Ahmadiyah.” Akademika: Jurnal pemikiran Islam 18, no. 2 (2013). https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/akademika/article/view/400.
November 6, 2007. www.nu.or.id/post/read/10437/mui-tetapkan-10-indikator-aliran-sesat.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47466/hikmah.v20i2.298
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ALHIKMAH Islamic Studies Institute (STAI ALHIKMAH) Jakarta Jl. Jeruk Purut No. 10 Cilandak Timur Pasar Minggu Jakarta Selatan 12650 Telp/Fax. (021) 7890521 E-mail: staialhikmahjakarta10@gmail.com/jurnal_hikmah@yahoo.com